The annexation in Siloam Springs

[See election results on this issue in this post.]

I have not had an opportunity to blog that much recently and I apologize to all who regularly read this blog. In this present political season, I feel that I should perhaps respond in some fashion to all of the negative campaigning that is currently happening in my community regarding an annexation measure. First off, the City would not be asking for this annexation if it was not in the best interest for the long-term growth and health of the community. What upsets me is all of the misinformation that seems to be spread around these days. Contrary to all of the lovely yellow signs we are seeing all over town, the annexation will NOT increase taxes of citizens that live inside the City limits.  Apparently, there was some confusion on this point in the local media. Taxes will increase slightly for those being annexed. But consider this: those being annexed would be also receiving services that they would not have otherwise, such as street lighting, sanitation, local street maintenance, to name a few. In addition, an extra-municipal utility surcharge would be waived if they are already on City services.

I know change can be difficult and even frightening. But change and growth is part of life.  Nothing can stay the same forever. If the City decides to simply freeze its boundaries, consider the fact that there would be absolutely no control over land use in the areas that surround Siloam Springs. Anyone can build just about anything without any consideration of infrastructure needs, land use balances, or the general livability of the community. That is what happens in areas that have no zoning controls whatsoever. Siloam Springs has a sizable planning area that encompasses areas outside of the City limits. The 2030 long range plan has made efforts to actually plan for this area. Without the police powers of zoning, the plan is effectively worthless when it comes to land use control. I don’t mean to sound fatalistic, but it concerns me that a small group of misinformed people can sway the vote of the entire community with these signs, when they are not considering all the facts and consequences of their actions on the long term welfare of the community in which they liveI see that if the annexation measure fails, it would literally stunt the growth of Siloam Springs and make annexation in the future more costly to tax payers. Annexation will need to come one day; it is enviable if the population continues to grow. Why not bite the bullet and do this now? I welcome your comments and feedback.

What is planning?

I have been meaning to make a substantive post on TAE for sometime; my apologies to all of the readers here that have been patiently waiting to learn more about the field of planning and what specifically I do. I think it is very interesting the questions that I receive as a planner. I think my field is one of mystery to many people in some ways, which is an irony in itself, because it so closely universally affects everyone.

So what is planning? Maybe the best way to break this down is by saying first off what planning is not. Planning is not a rote organizational tool to make your days more productive or an apparatus by which to lift outdated bureaucracies to more efficient epiphanies. Above all, the planning profession does not include wedding planners or event planners. I actually had someone think I did that once. Planning is more than an organizational tool in which someone thinks about planning out their day or their future. Planning is really the art of managing the processes of change and public facilitation and collaboration. It is also extremely diverse in the fields it is influenced by. Planning is political, legal, economic, social, technical, artistic, theoretical, and environmental.

So how is the vast planning profession manifested in the day to day work of a planner? Well, in planning there are many types of practitioners, similar to medicine, engineering, or law. There are transportation planners, environmental planners, policy planners, advocacy planners, land use planners, urban planners, current planners and long-range planners, to name a few. All of these subsets can be divided into the public sector or the private sector.

I will focus on the municipal side of planning as that is what I do. Typically, planning in a public sector setting includes the current planning and long-range planning subset. The following is a gross simplification of the daily life of a current planner. The current planner, or also known as the “planner of the day,” is a planner who handles all land use related requests from the public. Anytime someone wants to do something that affects urban form, i.e. subdividing land (literally where we get the term “subdivision”), constructing a new shopping center, or rezoning property, the current planner responds.

The current planner’s role is administrative. It involves checking permit applications to ensure that they conform to the Municipal Code provisions, zoning regulations, and the community’s master plan or comprehensive plan. Once everything is checked, the planner offers a recommendation relating to the item in question. This is forwarded in a staff report to the Planning Commission of the city. The Commission reads the report and then casts a vote which, in the case of my community Siloam Springs, is also a recommendation. The Planning Commission’s recommendation is forwarded to the Board of Directors (commonly referred to as the City Council) who makes the final decision on the item through an ordinance or a resolution, depending on the type of item. Every month there are applications made to the Planning Department, which the current planner must review and offer recommendations on. This is the unending development cycle that is part of the planner’s job to regulate and review.

Long-range planning in the municipal setting involves a more in depth look at how things should be. This is the area in which I am more adept to. I like to think about this kind of planning as more like problem solving. People have problems with life in their communities and planners seek out ways to fix these problems. Long-range planners think a lot about the future. They attempt to look at current trends and project needs for the future. These needs and current problems are embedded inside the community’s vision for the future. This vision, future needs, etc. are all housed within plans. Hence, the name planner is associated with the profession; they literally draft and author plans. The plans are essential public policy documents that work to guide future decision making by the elected officials and city staff. This is once again the Planning Commission and the City Council, which, as seen earlier in this blog, are reviewing development. So this brings us full circle. This is why I always say, planning is politics. Planning cannot escape the reach of politics and economics.

The important thing that I like to emphasize when I am talking about my job is that planners do not have as much power as people think they have. We are not a secret order making these plans to control everyone’s lives in the secluded dark corners of dusty offices in City Hall. Planning is far from that. Planning is a public process that involves anyone reading these words who may live in a city or town. That means you! You are the ones who do the planning! How is that? Let me explain.

Planners go to great lengths to harvest public participation. When planners are thinking about the community, they have an ethical obligation to take in the community’s needs and vision into account. This is the life blood of a good comprehensive plan. The vision is basically what the community will be. Will it be big or small? Will it have urban or rural character? It all comes down to the vision. In my community, when we were starting the process of creating a new comprehensive plan, I and some of my colleagues conducted vision sessions. These vision gathering sessions allowed anyone from the general public to take markers and literally draw out their plans for the community. Staff then worked to facilitate the process and ensured that everyone knew what to do and was actively engaged in the process. In the case of Siloam Springs, all of the maps we received were combined together into a master composite map. This composite map was the basis, or foundation, for the 2030 land use map.

I feel I have gone into more detail than I thought I would at the onset of writing this post today! I hope this clears up some of the mystery about what planning involves. Really, it is an interface or membrane between the publics’ needs and the governing entity that regulates the built and natural environment. I hope you have enjoyed this little window I have opened into the world of a planner. I will be posting more on how this relates to urban design and beyond!

Introduction to the City Planner

I am very happy to begin to post on this blog. This is the first time I have been given the opportunity to share some of my views regarding planning and urban design in this format.

A little about my background, I am originally from Lexington, Kentucky, where I lived for 16 years. I think it’s fair to say that many of my impressions regarding planning, in both the ills and successes, are formed from my time there. I went on to study in Colorado, where I received my Master’s degree in Urban and Regional Planning at the University of Colorado at Denver. I presently work as the City Planner for the City of Siloam Springs, Arkansas.

I know that there is much to discuss and explain relating to my field of study and how it applies to aesthetics. I hope to address these soon in future blogs. I am excited to be on board with the blogger team and look forward to many future discussions, rants and dissertations!

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 34 other followers