<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Have problems? Pay for an art mentor.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theaestheticelevator.com/2008/11/17/have-problems-pay-for-an-art-mentor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theaestheticelevator.com/2008/11/17/have-problems-pay-for-an-art-mentor/</link>
	<description>For a well-considered visual environment</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 01:23:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee Forrest</title>
		<link>http://theaestheticelevator.com/2008/11/17/have-problems-pay-for-an-art-mentor/#comment-12721</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lee Forrest]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 16:34:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theaestheticelevator.wordpress.com/?p=1734#comment-12721</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You&#039;re right. So the question is how to use negativity in a way that results in quality traffic and not quantity. I would be interested to see the metrics for this person&#039;s site after a couple of months.  good post.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right. So the question is how to use negativity in a way that results in quality traffic and not quantity. I would be interested to see the metrics for this person&#8217;s site after a couple of months.  good post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pNielsen</title>
		<link>http://theaestheticelevator.com/2008/11/17/have-problems-pay-for-an-art-mentor/#comment-12719</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pNielsen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 19:52:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theaestheticelevator.wordpress.com/?p=1734#comment-12719</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You&#039;re right about &quot;problem&quot; being searched for a lot more than &quot;talent&quot; (at least, according to Google Trends: http://www.google.com/trends?q=problem%2C+talent%2C+art%2C+artist&amp;ctab=0&amp;geo=US&amp;geor=all&amp;date=all&amp;sort=0). The most searched for terms don&#039;t always yield the best results though. Quality of traffic is as important as quantity in many cases.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right about &#8220;problem&#8221; being searched for a lot more than &#8220;talent&#8221; (at least, according to Google Trends: <a href="http://www.google.com/trends?q=problem%2C+talent%2C+art%2C+artist&#038;ctab=0&#038;geo=US&#038;geor=all&#038;date=all&#038;sort=0" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/trends?q=problem%2C+talent%2C+art%2C+artist&#038;ctab=0&#038;geo=US&#038;geor=all&#038;date=all&#038;sort=0</a>). The most searched for terms don&#8217;t always yield the best results though. Quality of traffic is as important as quantity in many cases.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee Forrest</title>
		<link>http://theaestheticelevator.com/2008/11/17/have-problems-pay-for-an-art-mentor/#comment-12718</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lee Forrest]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 18:42:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theaestheticelevator.wordpress.com/?p=1734#comment-12718</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From an internet marketing point of view, using the negative keyword (problems) may be more beneficial than a positive keyword like &#039;talent&#039; because it may be more likely that someone will search using the keyword &#039;problems&#039; within their search terms than they would &#039;talent&#039;...if they are having some type of artistic problem. 

From a print marketing standpoint, I don&#039;t think it would work, but for seo/sem...I think it was a smart move to incorporate negativity.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From an internet marketing point of view, using the negative keyword (problems) may be more beneficial than a positive keyword like &#8216;talent&#8217; because it may be more likely that someone will search using the keyword &#8216;problems&#8217; within their search terms than they would &#8216;talent&#8217;&#8230;if they are having some type of artistic problem. </p>
<p>From a print marketing standpoint, I don&#8217;t think it would work, but for seo/sem&#8230;I think it was a smart move to incorporate negativity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

