<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Putrid Pisa pulpit?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theaestheticelevator.com/2008/02/26/putrid-pisa-pulpit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theaestheticelevator.com/2008/02/26/putrid-pisa-pulpit/</link>
	<description>For a well-considered visual environment</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 01:23:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Semi-accidental Stumbled-upons : the way you worship is the way you live</title>
		<link>http://theaestheticelevator.com/2008/02/26/putrid-pisa-pulpit/#comment-10643</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Semi-accidental Stumbled-upons : the way you worship is the way you live]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 15:12:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theaestheticelevator.wordpress.com/?p=765#comment-10643</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] at The Aesthetic Elevator considers the oddest looking pulpit I&#8217;ve ever [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] at The Aesthetic Elevator considers the oddest looking pulpit I&#8217;ve ever [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Tinkler,</title>
		<link>http://theaestheticelevator.com/2008/02/26/putrid-pisa-pulpit/#comment-10640</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Tinkler,]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 16:43:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theaestheticelevator.wordpress.com/?p=765#comment-10640</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Remember, there&#039;s going to be a fourth figure behind them - the preacher!!  Yikes!

--the Cranky Professor]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember, there&#8217;s going to be a fourth figure behind them &#8211; the preacher!!  Yikes!</p>
<p>&#8211;the Cranky Professor</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TAE</title>
		<link>http://theaestheticelevator.com/2008/02/26/putrid-pisa-pulpit/#comment-10627</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TAE]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 22:37:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theaestheticelevator.wordpress.com/?p=765#comment-10627</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I try, in my mind anyway, to focus on works that I like. This doesn&#039;t always happen though, and as artists we always need to be ready and able to take constructive criticism ;-} And when I review openings, everything&#039;s up for grabs anyway!

This one was just too good to pass up.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I try, in my mind anyway, to focus on works that I like. This doesn&#8217;t always happen though, and as artists we always need to be ready and able to take constructive criticism ;-} And when I review openings, everything&#8217;s up for grabs anyway!</p>
<p>This one was just too good to pass up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim J.</title>
		<link>http://theaestheticelevator.com/2008/02/26/putrid-pisa-pulpit/#comment-10626</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim J.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 22:18:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theaestheticelevator.wordpress.com/?p=765#comment-10626</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh, my.

Uggh.

I can understand tension, informal composition... but this is just awkward, both in the internal harmony of the piece (between the individual elements) and in relation to its environment. I think the bit that appears to be melting over the step and onto the floor is meant to be inspired, but it&#039;s just obtuse. What overriding force of symbolism or visual balance gave rise to THAT?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, my.</p>
<p>Uggh.</p>
<p>I can understand tension, informal composition&#8230; but this is just awkward, both in the internal harmony of the piece (between the individual elements) and in relation to its environment. I think the bit that appears to be melting over the step and onto the floor is meant to be inspired, but it&#8217;s just obtuse. What overriding force of symbolism or visual balance gave rise to THAT?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

